Doctors with MBAs: A New Prescription for Healthcare Leadership
May 9, 2024
Read MoreDecember 15, 2024
A recent article in the Financial Times explores how European and American business schools are navigating the challenging terrain of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) education, highlighting profound differences in curriculum, political climate, and institutional perspectives.
Contrasting the sustainability approaches of European and American business schools, the article paints a nuanced picture of how regional contexts shape business education’s response to global challenges. Europe emerges as a leader in sustainability education, driven by stronger climate policies, progressive environmental standards, and a more integrated approach to ESG principles. European business schools are weaving sustainability into their core curriculum, reflecting the continent’s commitment to balancing business growth with environmental responsibility.
Conversely, US business schools face significant challenges. A growing political backlash against ESG investing has created a cautious environment. Andrew Hoffman from the University of Michigan highlights the “right-leaning antagonism” towards what is perceived as “woke” education, causing schools to tread carefully in addressing sustainability issues.
International students are particularly drawn to European programs. Snigdh Singh, an Indian student at ESCP Business School, highlights Europe’s advanced policies, innovative technologies, and strong environmental frameworks as key attractions. Julia Binder, a professor of sustainable innovation and business transformation at IMD Business School argues that European institutions are uniquely positioned to lead sustainability education, citing high societal expectations and robust regulatory frameworks like the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The article concludes by suggesting that the future of business education lies in a comprehensive, integrated approach to sustainability—one that goes beyond traditional business metrics to address broader societal and environmental challenges.
This transatlantic divide reflects more than just educational differences; it represents competing visions of business’s role in addressing global sustainability challenges. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected and environmentally precarious, the approach taken by these business schools will likely play a crucial role in shaping future business practices.